Covid jabs are called "bioweapons" in court!

[chr0naut]

You may find this very interesting. It is dealing with Ebola but could also apply to Covid.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/de...0642735596

I looked up the sources he referenced.

https://www.who.int/news/item/14-02-2020...prevention

The vaccine was green lit November 19, 2019.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/ervebo

The rVSVΔG‐ZEBOV‐GP immunization is a live attenuated viral vector (but not an Ebola virus).

As it was a live attenuated virus, it can possibly shed (transmit to others), but what this would mean in the real world is that it would potentially carry its immunity properties to those not directly injected (but as the virus is attenuated, its infectiousness and transmissibility is very weak).

Other types of immunizations cannot shed.

January 19, 2020 was when the first American tested positive for Covid-19.

The first death was February [28], 2020 in Seattle. This is significant because Bill Gates had funded the Seattle flu study which ended up identifying that Covid was spreading undetected in Seattle.
Now for some weirdness.

Gates decided to fund this through the Brotman Baty Institute. The team created a new diagnostic tool, process and share the results and perform quality checks to make sure all the work was valid. So far good.

In 2018 & 2019 they tested more than 11,000 cases of flu and sequenced more than 2,300 influenza genomes.... #23 Billy's approved number.

But the genome of SARS-CoV-2 was not known until 12 January 2020, so it doesn't matter how many cases of Flu they found in 2018 & 2019. They could never have identified (by PCR amplification and sequencing) the SARS-CoV-2 strain, the cause of COVID-19 symptoms, back then.

By February 2020 a genomics researcher named Lea Starita had developed her own PCR test for Covid and her team began running it in a few hundred samples that they had gathered for the flu study. Page 71.

At the time, only 18 Covid cases had been confirmed through testing in all of West Washington. The team was finding very different results.

At that time, PCR took a longer time. It was also the gold standard genomic detection method and had been so for decades.

It was important that a more rapid PCR test was developed due to urgency of testing potentially hundreds or thousands of people quickly. Starita's test was a candidate Rt-PCR.

Unfortunately, rapid PCR tests have more false positives and false negatives than the slower tests. It's a given. But even a partially accurate test is useful if you know the margins for error and accommodate them. At the early stages, no-one even knew the error margins of new Rt-PCR methods. They had to be established by clinical trial.

So, if the Rt-PCR tests were revealing more cases than the older, more thorough full PCR and sequencing method, it indicates that that particular Rt-PCR method is not accurate, it is not definitive of if there are more, or less, cases of asymptomatic infection.

Because they were using the patient's samples on Covid and not the flu - "revealing the results of that test test to anyone - even to the patient or, much less to public health officials- was another matter. It would be a violation of the flu study's research protocols."

This when there was a potential health threat emerging.

That would be bad if you could definitively say that the particular method was accurate, but at the time, everything was still under development.

There was concern over causing undue panic and there are privacy and ethical guidelines which may not be as valid in the particular situation, but do exist for valid general legal and ethical reasons.

"Also their Covid test had been approved  for use in research studies, but not in medical settings."

There was no way to get their tests authorized because the CDC had not established any rules for approving Covid tests.

How could they have procedures defined about testing for a novel virus they barely knew about? Cart before the horse?

So here we have this group, funded by Bill Gates where they can see the spread and they couldn't tell anyone.

They could tell people, in anonymized papers, anonymized press releases, anonymized private messages and anonymized reports.

But as their test was producing more apparent positives than a more accurate 'gold-standard' test, it was more likely showing up that their test procedures needed to be tweaked to improve accuracy to an acceptable level.

When they finally advised the government they were ordered to shut down. That is weird.

The CDC kept pivoting allowing them to start and then shut them down again and then restart. That is weird.
On June 10, the team took up testing again.

Nope, not weird. The particular Rt-PCR tests were not definitive, but the urgency for Rt-PCR was growing, and the CDC was vacillating because they just didn't know. It was all new stuff.

This is from Billy's plandemic manual.

June 10th is when Billy is to testify.

Gates at any point in time could have stepped in and influenced the CDC because after all he was a close friend of Fauci. But he did nothing and watched the spread. He was funding it so he would have know the results. Evil.

Bill Gates has no medical degree nor doctorate. He is an investor in philanthropic causes. As an investor, he is hoping to turn a profit, and also possibly do some good in the process.

Some investors fund weapons, and fund industries that pollute dangerously, and fund terrorism. That is way more evil from the outset than someone who invests in medicine.

I can't understand how the ONLY people who were actively working to save and help people (doctors, the WHO, the CDC, medical associations, and ethical investors, etc) are instead painted as the bad guys, and those who work against those ethical causes and do stuff-all for anyone else, and self-promote, are somehow the good guys?

- Innocents die as collateral in wars whose aims are not in the favor of the general populace.

- Forever chemical producers ignore the deaths that such carcinogens will cause perpetually.

- And many people are dying , and have died unnecessarily, because of vaccine hesitancy.

[Thoughtful3]

I really agree with you that Bill Gates is in this for profit and he sure has made a profit. In fact this whole Covid has been the best investment he has ever made, which he stated at the WEF.

In fact the entire field of medical research has been hijacked. There are some really good people, like you, who have integrity and want to do the best for people but then we have those who are in for profit and don't care about the quality of their work. 

From page 45 in Billy's plandemic manual here is his mind set-
"My favorite example is season 3 of the TV show 24- a show I really liked- where a terrorist intentionally releases a pathogen in Las Angeles."
"..."and [the best part] how bad the traffic will get as people flee the city."

What we need to come to terms with is that there are some very evil people. Numbers play a very significant role with Billy.
Remember I noted this book cost $28.
Bill Gates birthday is October 28.
Then there was the social distance 6 foot rule of 28 tennis balls. Those are his words. I'm not measuring them.

Now look at this.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defen...-outbreak/

The second dose is 28 days later.

Look at Trump's watch-
https://gettrumpwatches.com/?srsltid=Afm...zrDr6kv150

Now for page 28- the Director for the CDC in 2020 was a political appointee who was not an epidemiologist.
 "Imagine a general who has never been through a battle simulation having to run a war."

All by the numbers.
The first American who died of Covid was on February 28, 2020.

Anyway I just wanted to share this with you. I myself was very skeptical about the numerical connections that is until I started to investigate the Gates family.


I find the release of this DOOM video of Billy most suspicious coming on the heels of his Mr. Rogers appearance. The date of this is February 22, 2024.
The first chapter in his plandemic manual begins on page 22. On this page in the footnotes he makes a big deal about defining the word "WE".
W=23 +
E=5...
 =28.

[Thoughtful3]

The rVSVΔG‐ZEBOV‐GP immunization is a live attenuated viral vector (but not an Ebola virus).

As it was a live attenuated virus, it can possibly shed (transmit to others), but what this would mean in the real world is that it would potentially carry its immunity properties to those not directly injected (but as the virus is attenuated, its infectiousness and transmissibility is very weak).

Other types of immunizations cannot shed.


But the genome of SARS-CoV-2 was not known until 12 January 2020, so it doesn't matter how many cases of Flu they found in 2018 & 2019. They could never have identified (by PCR amplification and sequencing) the SARS-CoV-2 strain, the cause of COVID-19 symptoms, back then.


At that time, PCR took a longer time. It was also the gold standard genomic detection method and had been so for decades.

It was important that a more rapid PCR test was developed due to urgency of testing potentially hundreds or thousands of people quickly. Starita's test was a candidate Rt-PCR.

Unfortunately, rapid PCR tests have more false positives and false negatives than the slower tests. It's a given. But even a partially accurate test is useful if you know the margins for error and accommodate them. At the early stages, no-one even knew the error margins of new Rt-PCR methods. They had to be established by clinical trial.

So, if the Rt-PCR tests were revealing more cases than the older, more thorough full PCR and sequencing method, it indicates that that particular Rt-PCR method is not accurate, it is not definitive of if there are more, or less, cases of asymptomatic infection.


That would be bad if you could definitively say that the particular method was accurate, but at the time, everything was still under development.

There was concern over causing undue panic and there are privacy and ethical guidelines which may not be as valid in the particular situation, but do exist for valid general legal and ethical reasons.


How could they have procedures defined about testing for a novel virus they barely knew about? Cart before the horse?


They could tell people, in anonymized papers, anonymized press releases, anonymized private messages and anonymized reports.

But as their test was producing more apparent positives than a more accurate 'gold-standard' test, it was more likely showing up that their test procedures needed to be tweaked to improve accuracy to an acceptable level.


Nope, not weird. The particular Rt-PCR tests were not definitive, but the urgency for Rt-PCR was growing, and the CDC was vacillating because they just didn't know. It was all new stuff.


Bill Gates has no medical degree nor doctorate. He is an investor in philanthropic causes. As an investor, he is hoping to turn a profit, and also possibly do some good in the process.

Some investors fund weapons, and fund industries that pollute dangerously, and fund terrorism. That is way more evil from the outset than someone who invests in medicine.

I can't understand how the ONLY people who were actively working to save and help people (doctors, the WHO, the CDC, medical associations, and ethical investors, etc) are instead painted as the bad guys, and those who work against those ethical causes and do stuff-all for anyone else, and self-promote, are somehow the good guys?

- Innocents die as collateral in wars whose aims are not in the favor of the general populace.

- Forever chemical producers ignore the deaths that such carcinogens will cause perpetually.

- And many people are dying , and have died unnecessarily, because of vaccine hesitancy.

They have hijacked the vaccines when the government provided big pharma with an immunity shield. It is not normal to keep expanding the childhood vaccine schedule endlessly for diseases that children can easily survive. Some vaccines I'm sure are and have been good.

Recently I went to an autism fair and I was shocked. There were sooo many parents and children there.
In fact there are now stores offering specialty products to help those children afflicted with autism along with services.
The parents are desperate.

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/trump-sign...er-backing

Melinda Gates published her first book "Moment of Lift" on April [23], 2019.
April 23 is the 113 day of the year.
The plandemic was called on 3/11
113<> 311 mirror.
Page 43, line 1 in his plandemic manual "There are 311,000 full time fire fighters in the United States, stationed at 30,000 departments." < This just randomly inserted.

It gets stranger.
Jennifer Gates birthday is April 26, 3 days later she turned 23 in 2019.
Rory Gates birthday is May 23
Phoebe Gates birthday is September 14 [14+9=23].
Bill Gates father died September 14, 2020. [23]

When the Ebola vaccine was rolled out to healthcare workers in DR Congo September 14, 2025 when Phoebe turned 23.

https://x.com/AlbertBourla/status/1573765059540647936
Timestamp 2:03 P.M. September 24. He had contracted Covid in mid August. Melinda Gates birthday is August 15th.

Like I said everything is by the numbers, because that is what Bill Gates excels at.

His family background is eugenics and now he has the money to do something about it. He has created a vaccine cartel through CEPI, GAVI, has more than a passing influence with the WHO. He writes about his close relationship with Fauci, and during the plandemic he writes that he was in constant contact with him.

Here's his tweet threat from April 14, 2020 , Timestamp 11:17 P.M. [11+ 17=28]
He made another tweet threat September 29, 2025 @ 11:17 AM. [28] when USAID was cut. I'm not sure where that one went but you can see the trend.

I have set up an "All Things Gates " chart and have been tracking them daily since early 2020.

https://x.com/BillGates/status/1250292126643941376

Remember his dog's name is Nilla<> All In.
Jennifer Gates husband named his Olympian horse Corona do.