DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

Mathmaticians Demand Uncertanty from AI
#11
(Yesterday, 01:26 AM)chr0naut Wrote: But surely Mathmagicians can call upon the smoldering incense of Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems, correctly incanted, like a bunch of burning sage, they can exorcise even the most persistent ghosts of rigor and certainty from that ancient tome of the Principia?

Tongue



There's a few areas that could break AI l such as if you put x^0 it equals 1 but 0^x = 0 which creates a contradiction that' is easy for humans to solve but AI doesn't have the 'fuzzy logic' required to solve it.

The main worry is it solving mass prime factorisation or using Prim's Algorithm as AI could easily break all encryption and the banking system to gain control of most weapons and all money in the world stored in banks. Thankfully Ai still gets a lot wrong and it's answers need to be heavily scrutinised for errors but it is improving at a scary pace.
#12
(Yesterday, 11:23 AM)bastion Wrote: There's a few areas that could break AI l such as if you put x^0 it equals 1 but 0^x = 0 which creates a contradiction that' is easy for humans to solve but AI doesn't have the 'fuzzy logic' required to solve it.

The main worry is it solving mass prime factorisation or using Prim's Algorithm as AI could easily break all encryption and the banking system to gain control of most weapons and all money in the world stored in banks. Thankfully Ai still gets a lot wrong and it's answers need to be heavily scrutinised for errors but it is improving at a scary pace.

But AI does not need to take over the weapons and banking system. It only needs to shut down he transportation systems to kill half of humanity in less than a month. No food, no humans. The bigger the city, the faster the death.

The biggest problem is those in charge of government and corporations are blind to that threat.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#13
And now we have astrophysists not liking AI. 

https://www.techradar.com/pro/ai-tools-c...supernovae

Again, it is simply a problem of the clickers can do research, with the numbers, faster then humans.

The mental workers seem to be the target of the moment. I wonder, does that make politicians safe.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?
#14
"Nobody needs AI to search the Internet, court says in ruling against Google" said in a ruling by a German court. 

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026...st-google/

This could have widespread implications for AI search engines. 

In other legal news, works of AI without human involvement cannot be copyrighted in the USA.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922

The tide is turning. The courts are ruling for the people.
I know too much and question everything.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?
Did anyone ask the monkeys how much fun the barrel actually was?