Yesterday, 04:19 AM
(06-20-2026, 01:44 PM)Thoughtful3 Wrote: Here's the study that was prepared by NIH scientists about Remdesivir and ZMapp- December 12, 2019.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1910993
"Remdesivir showed significantly worse outcomes compared to other investigational drugs"
The text you quoted immediately above does not appear anywhere in the paper you linked to.
In fact, in that paper, Z MAPP drugs had worse outcomes than Remdesivir.
Quote:On August 9 "recommended terminating Z Mapp and Remdesivir."
"Mortality exceeded 50%."
The paper upon which the the alleged August 9 recommendation was based did not show that mortality exceeded 50% for either Z MAPP nor for Remdesivir.
Quote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_Lane
Well I didn't start off being an anti- vaxer but I am now and I do believe it was a plandemic.
I could find no reference to Dr Clifford Lane ever having said such a thing. Was that supposed to be a quote from him?
Quote:Fauci was the head of the NIH-
https://www.npr.org/2005/05/27/4669470/n...r-children
Quoting from the NPR Interview:
From Dr Fishbein: "clinical research was the only opportunity for some of these children to get some of the drugs believed to be beneficial to their condition."
So, all these children had AIDS, which untreated was was a death sentence, and the researchers were motivated by humanitarian concern to save these children, even as part of a clinical trial.
And from Dr Klein: "... foster children were not targeted for this research. Rather, they were given the same access that was given to children who had more resources and parents."
Also from Dr Klein: "Well, in my own studies here in Texas, I would say 95 percent of the children who were enrolled in trials actually had parents, so really a small percentage came from foster care."
Here's something to ponder, would you withhold a potentially lifesaving medicine from a dying child?
Support the Christchurch Call





